U.S. District Judge John D. Bates said: "There is a strong argument that, at this late date, the public interest would best be served by allowing the 2005 Inauguration ceremony to proceed … as planned. That would be consistent with the inclusion of religious prayer or reference in every inauguration commencing with the first inauguration of President Washington in 1789. To do otherwise, moreover, would at this eleventh hour cause considerable disruption in a significant, carefully-planned, national event, requiring program and other adjustments."
Good news, but the Post ran the story on A8, and the NY Times didn’t see it is as a top story either. Also, because the judge cited the eleventh hour as part of the rationale the door is open for other challenges, it seems to me (I am not an attorney).
--James Jewell
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder